Slick’s flat, Tuesday 17th April 20:21
Evening sports fans,
Today was my first day back at work after a wonderful holiday in Dubai with my parents. I had an awesome time, which made going back in today even harder than it usually is (and it’s usually pretty hard. Giggity.) But, I got up at half 7 anyway and went to work because I need the money.
Or do I? This brings me neatly to my point. I’d like to say something about money, and it’s acquisition. I’ve touched on this briefly before, but I think it bears further analysis. Why do people feel a need to acquire more and more money? Do they think it will make them happy? Will it make them happy? I know we like to say trite things like “money can’t buy happiness”, but is it really possible to be happy without some base level of material wealth?
I will start, as usual, by looking at myself. I am very handsome. Good, mirror check complete. To return to the subject at hand however, I have to say that greed for material wealth and possessions is one of the few vices which is not on my extensive list of character flaws- my material needs are few. Generally I am content to be housed and fed, with a little left over for visiting friends and drinking. My phone is super old and not worth anything, and I deliberately buy very cheap watches- only partially because I know I will lose them. I tend not to buy designer clothing, although I am fond of suits. I rarely buy music or video games that aren’t severely discounted. I do take expensive holidays, but only because I like to travel long distances for extended periods of time- when i arrive at my destination I am generally happy traveling on a shoe-string, sleeping in dorms and eating street vendor food.
I have a job- I work 9 to 5- but I have no compunctions about taking the odd day off to, for example, go and visit some friends or go on holiday for two weeks, because for me the free time is worth more than the lost wages. And therein lies the rub- at what point does someone say “OK, I have enough money now, I will stop earning”? For me it’s quite early, but some people never seem satisfied, and are always working towards the next promotion so they can buy the latest thing and that will somehow make them happy.
Just to be clear, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with liking money and wanting to acquire it- I know most people are much less lazy than me, and that, for example, it requires an awful lot of capital to raise a family. If you are working hard to get more money to pay for your children’s education or whatever, I totally get it (incidentally this is one of many reasons I’m not sold on the idea of having children. I’m much to selfish and lazy to put in the work required to provide for them). My issue is more with people who seem to want money for money’s sake, multi-billionaires who still somehow spend there lives in offices, working to make more money. At what point does one stop? I also understand, to some extent, the desire to earn money for material comfort- people who like the prestige of wearing Gucci clothes and messing around on Ipads- again, i don’t share their idea of fun (for me, no handbag should be worth more than say, £100 and yet I know there exist handbags which cost 20 times that at least), but I get that for some people there is comfort and value to be had in material stuff. I assume it makes one feel secure?
And this, I think, is the crux of the issue. I probably sound very glib about my own natural lack of avarice, but the truth is that I can only really adopt this attitude because I am extensively supported by my parents, who are quite well off. I could probably lead my present lifestyle on about £600 a month- but many of my expenses are taken care of, and always have been. In fact, i think that in some strange way, a comfortable, privileged upbringing is precisely what engenders disdain for material wealth. I don’t feel the need to bust a gut earning more and more money because I’ve always had money and as such it doesn’t hold any fascination for me. I think the opposite is true, too- just think how many self made millionaires, like Sir Alan Sugar, started out with comparatively little. I believe it is the absence of material wealth which drives such people to keep achieving, keep earning- as if to say “once I had nothing, so now that I can, I will have everything”
In the end, I think both types of people are necessary for a well functioning society, at least in a capitalist economy. We need some people to be always working at earning more and more money to drive the economy- even if I don’t personally understand their motivations- just as we need some people who are relatively free from monetary concerns; the thinkers and dream-weavers. In Plato’s Republic, he described a similar system, with a merchant class, a soldier class (don’t worry about them for now) and a higher caste of philosopher kings, who would live comfortable, but communally and without personal wealth. Doesn’t sound so bad to me; perhaps a vow of poverty should be a requirement for government.
Vote Slick for Philosopher-King 2012
Toodles,
Slick